Free server software modeled after Firebase, with end-to-end encryption built in. Powers EteSync.
Curious fact: Most of the code of the C and Java client libraries is Rust.
Free server software and clients for personal data synchronization. Comes with Java, Rust, and Python libraries. Android client available on F-Droid, GNOME (Evolution) and KDE (Kontact) integrations upstreamed.
A web site that lets you compare various programmer’s fonts with one another.
Rust’s core, on the other hand, is. You do not need to worry about library code silently calling into an allocator or attempting to invoke syscalls if you are on no_std, and you still have a wealth of libraries available to you in no_std land. This makes Rust uniquely suited for dabbling in embedded programming.
Another pure Java TUI library.
A pure Java TUI library.
An object-oriented Java terminal manipulation library based on Elegant Objects principles.
A TurboVision-like text-based user interface framework for Java.
Extremely memory-efficient JSON for Rust.
Type-erased thin pointers for Rust.
A Rust library to create custom dynamically sized types.
Tagged-pointer unions in Rust.
More efficient synchronization primitives for Rust than the standard library provides.
A static type checker for JavaScript. Stricter than Flow and TypeScript with better type inference. Does not extend the language.
A Rust test harness that is no_std and can run on a microcontroller. You can use it to run your unit tests on the actual hardware you are targeting.
Matthias
#
Ich wurde kürzlich darauf hingewiesen, daß Doppelnennungen wie in „Studentinnen und Studenten“ nicht als inklusiv gelten, da sie nur Frauen und Männer einschließen, nicht aber Menschen, die sich als weder noch begreifen. Nur mit Gendersternchen sei es inklusiv: „Student*innen“.
Ich schlage eine Alternative vor. Wie wäre es, wenn wir wieder dazu übergingen, mehr angelsächsische Kultur zu übernehmen, und einfach „Studenten“ sagten? Revolutionär, ich weiß.
Matthias
#
Remember: The closer we get to a vaccine, the easier it is to justify a stricter lockdown.
If the logic behind that statement doesn’t seem obvious to you, think about the extreme cases: If we were in a pandemic with no chance of ever getting rid of it or finding any sort of treatment, a lockdown would make little sense. Since everyone would contract the virus eventually, very few people would be saved by the measures, but more people would suffer or even die due to the economic consequences of a lockdown whose duration would have to be indefinite. If, on the other hand, we were just two weeks away from eradicating the pandemic at the snip of a finger, then it would clearly be the correct thing to do to impose a strict lockdown for those two weeks in order to maximize the number of lives saved, since each person who manages to avoid the virus for just another two weeks would be saved from it for good.
A UI framework for very small VT100-compatible terminals.